Surveillance & Press Freedom
Morocco surveillance report details spyware, hidden recordings and targeted journalists
An Amnesty International investigation, supported by a whistleblower and forensic work, describes a long-running surveillance system targeting journalists and rights defenders. Morocco has repeatedly denied using spyware illegally and did not answer Amnesty before publication.
A whistleblower account was tested against records and forensic evidence
Amnesty International released an investigation on October 1 alleging that Moroccan intelligence services used commercial spyware, physical access to devices, hidden cameras and microphones, phone-location data and informants against journalists and human-rights defenders. Amnesty says the work draws on testimony from a former surveillance operative identified as Safir, interviews with 10 targeted people, internal documents, independent sources and forensic analysis. Those are investigative findings, not a judicial determination that every described operation occurred exactly as alleged. [1][2][4]
The report describes remote infection with tools including Pegasus and physical access to devices at airports, repair shops and other locations. Amnesty says some phones were returned already compromised, while other operations relied on covert recording equipment or access to call and location data. Because the whistleblower's identity is protected, readers cannot independently examine his service record; Amnesty says it corroborated consequential claims before publication. [1][2][4]
The potential-target list is broader than confirmed device infections
Amnesty says it identified 103 phone numbers selected for potential targeting between September and December 2017: 65 people in civil society, including 34 rights defenders, 22 journalists, five lawyers and four academics; 25 political or public officials; five diplomats or representatives of international organizations; and eight people in other roles. Selection in a targeting system does not by itself prove that a device was successfully infected. [2][4]
The investigation includes journalist Omar Radi and economist and activist Fouad Abdelmoumni. It says surveillance was followed in some cases by prosecution, imprisonment, smear campaigns or exposure of private material. Those consequences vary by person and proceeding; the evidence does not establish that surveillance alone caused every later action. [1][4][5]
Government and vendor accountability questions remain open
Le Monde's reporting for a Forbidden Stories collaboration says the evidence includes procurement records and operational detail involving products linked to NSO Group, Memento Labs and Verint. Amnesty says it sent detailed findings to Moroccan authorities four weeks before publication and received no response. It also sought responses from companies named in the report; supplier statements do not resolve how any particular tool was deployed. [2][4]
The consortium did not detect Pegasus use in Morocco after autumn 2021, but that is not proof that surveillance stopped. Other techniques were reported later. Moroccan authorities have repeatedly denied illegal spyware use; Arabic-language coverage says no new official response had appeared. Arabic and French sources were reviewed in the original and summarized here in English. [4][6][3]
How the sources compare
| Source | What it adds | Scope or limitation |
|---|---|---|
| Amnesty International · English, French and Arabic | The report, methodology, target categories, named cases, company questions and notice sent to Moroccan authorities. | The language editions are one investigative origin; the whistleblower remains anonymous and Amnesty's findings are not a court judgment. |
| Le Monde / Forbidden Stories · English | Separate consortium reporting on procurement, operational techniques, vendor links and the absence of detected Pegasus activity after autumn 2021. | It shares underlying whistleblower material with Amnesty and cannot prove that an undetected capability was absent. |
| Al Jazeera English and Al-Araby Al-Jadeed · English and Arabic | Current coverage, press-freedom context and Morocco's earlier public denial of illegal spyware use. | Both rely substantially on Amnesty for the new findings; no new Moroccan response was available. |
What remains unclear
Whether Moroccan authorities will provide a detailed answer to the newly published evidence.
How many of the 103 selected numbers resulted in successful device compromise.
Which capabilities remain operational in 2026 and under what authorization.
Whether an independent authority will investigate the allegations.
Sources & translations
- Amnesty International — Morocco: A web of surveillance to silence journalists and activists
- Amnesty International — Maroc. Un lanceur d'alerte révèle comment les autorités ont utilisé un vaste système de surveillanceFrench reviewed in the original and summarized in English; figures, dates and response status were checked against the full report.
- Amnesty International — مصدر سابق يكشف كيف استخدم المغرب شبكة مراقبة لإسكات الصحفيين والنشطاءArabic reviewed in the original and summarized in English; it is the same Amnesty origin.
- Le Monde / Forbidden Stories — Morocco's frenzy for purchasing surveillance tools, revealed by whistleblower
- Al Jazeera English — Moroccan intelligence uses surveillance to silence journalists: Amnesty
- Al-Araby Al-Jadeed — منظمة العفو الدولية: المغرب أنشأ منظومة مراقبة لتكميم أفواه الصحافيين والناشطينArabic reviewed in the original and summarized in English; the page identifies AFP as the reporting origin, so it is not counted separately from other AFP-based copies.
Updates & corrections
- — Initial report separates investigative findings from judicially established facts, and potential targeting from confirmed infection.